Friday, December 5, 2014

Post #21-Table Of Contents:
Post #1-This is How "Things as They Really Are" Really is
Post #2-Science-Oriented Observation I
Post #3-Families Bound by Stories
Post #4-Science-Oriented Observation II
Post #5-Rhetorical Analysis Reflection
Post #6-Research Topic #1
Post #7-General Conference Review
Post #8-Research Paper Topic #2
Post #9-Elements 119 and 120?
Post #10-Rock Metamorphism and Life
Post #11-Research Paper Reflection
Post#12-Flerovium-289m=Ununtrium-288
Post #13-My Experience at College
Post #14-Personal Narrative
Post #15-My Google Profile Picture
Post #16-Parallels Between Nuclei Size and Living Life
Post #17-My Blog Background
Post #18-My Personal History
Post #19-My High School Research Paper
Post #20-Blog Reflection
Post #21-Table of Contents



Post #20-Blog Reflection

I had a blast writing this blog. For me, it has been the highlight of taking Writing 150, in addition to the personal narrative. Whenever I wanted to share some scientific information that I was excited about, I would post it on this blog. Some of my posts explain my blog design. Other posts of mine offer parallels to science and life. Still other posts are related to talks given by General Authorities.
I slowly learned to appreciate writing this blog. At the beginning of the semester, I was reluctant to begin writing a blog, because I associated blog-writing with the stereotype. In about October, I finally learned to appreciate writing this blog. Through my blog, I was able to vent my feelings on my experience writing the research paper, which felt like it had as much regulation as the 800-page Obamacare bill that was shoved through Congress. See, right now I am using my blog to vent. My blog has been a great outlet for some of my feelings about life and science as well.
When I told my brother that I had a blog for my writing class. he said in his text: "You should put ads on the blog". I have yet to take up his advice.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Post #19-My High School Research Paper

This is my research paper about the spontaneous fission of even-mass rutherfordium and seaborgium isotopes that I wrote for my AP English Literature class in senior year. This got a low B-, because the topic wasn't "debatable". He wrote a comment on my paper that I got a higher score than I deserved, but he acknowledged the good academic-style writing of it. Other students in my class discussed ethical issues and  other controversial topics, and some got high A grades. I have always been curious about why the specific isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium had such short spontaneous fission half-lives ever since I compiled my first isotope catalog, and so I took advantage of this opportunity to research the origin of the short half-lives. I really wish I could have researched the stabilizing effect of odd amounts of neutrons and/or protons in superheavy nuclei, but I had three other AP classes and I worked 25 hours a week at this point in my life. Here's the paper I wrote, including MLA citations:

Nate Kloepfer
Mr. Andrus
AP English Lit
4 April 2014
Rapid Spontaneous Fission of Even-Even Rutherfordium and Seaborgium Isotopes
        Looking at a sequential list of isotopes of the elements rutherfordium and seaborgium, it is hard for one not to notice the short half-lives of the isotopes with even amounts of neutrons and protons. For example, the half-life of even-even rutherfordium-258 is 0.012 seconds, as compared to the half-lives of rutherfordium-257 and -259, are 4.7 seconds and 2.8 seconds, respectively (“Isotopes of Rutherfordium” 1). The origin of the short half-life of rutherfordium-258, and other light even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium, is their rapid spontaneous fission. The even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium have comparably short fission half-lives because of incomplete nucleon shell effects of the two elements, the destabilizing nature of unpaired nucleons, and the smaller fission barriers that come with added protons.
        One of the origins of the short spontaneous fission half-lives of rutherfordium and seaborgium is the incomplete nucleonic shells that these nuclei have. As a general rule, nuclei with complete nuclear shells are stabilized more against spontaneous fission than comparable nuclei with incomplete nuclear shells (Somerville 8). The dominant nuclear subshells in the rutherfordium-seaborgium region of nuclear map are neutron numbers N=152 and N=162, and proton numbers Z=100, Z=102, and Z=108 (“Study of Fission Barriers” 1). The listed stabilized proton numbers do not include Z=104 (rutherfordium) or Z=106 (seaborgium), suggesting that Z=104,106 proton number is an incomplete nuclear subshell that destabilizes the nuclei against fission.
        The absence of unpaired nucleons in the even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium contributes to their comparably short spontaneous fission half-lives. The presence of an odd amount of protons or neutrons increase the fission half-lives by at least one order of magnitude, and the fission half-lives of odd-odd nuclei increase by up to 8 orders of magnitude (“Exploring the Island” 1). The reason behind the enhanced stability of nuclei with odd amounts of nucleons is due to nuclear pairing effects. The absence of unpaired nucleons in even-even isotopes results in more rapid spontaneous fission ("The New Isotope 270110"). Like splitting wood with the grain, paired nucleons in the even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium cause them to fission easily.
        The primary reason why the even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium have short spontaneous fission half-lives is the presence of smaller fission barriers. To calculate the fission barriers, nuclear binding energy is graphed as a function of deformation (“Study of Fission Barriers” 2). The results of plotting the fission barriers for even-even superheavy nuclei suggest an overall lowering of both fission barriers as the proton number increases from Z=100 to Z=110 (“Study of Fission Barriers” 4). A lower fission barrier means less resistance to fission, and thus shorter half-lives. The collapse of the outer, more deformed fission barrier in the isotopes of rutherfordium destabilize the nuclei to spontaneous fission. The second fission barrier is nonexistant for seaborgium isotopes and heavier (Hulet 13). The second fission barrier is important to the stability of superheavy nuclei, because it means that the nucleus must undergo a greater deformation to fission. If a proton-rich nucleus lacks a second fission barrier, the Coloumb force overwhelms the Strong nuclear force much more easily, and the nucleus fissions. Thus the rapid fission of rutherfordium and seaborgium.
        The factors of incomplete subshells, small fission barriers, and the absence of unpaired nucleons all work together to make the even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium very unstable to spontaneous fission. The proton subshells of Z=102 and Z=108 mostly confine the fissioning nuclides to Z=104 (rutherfordium) and Z=106 (seaborgium), while the decreasing fission barriers of the increasingly proton-rich nuclei further shortens the half-lives. The instability is confined to the even-even isotopes of rutherfordium and seaborgium, because of the absence of unpaired nucleons. Thus the nuclei rutherfordium-254, 256, 258, 260, 262, and seaborgium-258, 260, 262, 264, and 266 all have dominant fission decay modes with short half-lives.
Works Cited
Hulet, E. K. "SciTech Connect:." SciTech Connect:. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
n.d. Web.
Hofmann, Sigurd, F. Heßberger, and et al. "The new isotope 270110 and its decay products
266Hs and 262Sg."link.springer.com. The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei, n.d. Web. 18 Mar 2014. <link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10050017013>.
Hofmann, Sigurd. "Viewpoint: Exploring the island of superheavy elements." physics.aps.org.
N.p., 09 Apr 2010. Web. 18 Mar 2014. <http://physics.aps.org/articles/v3/31?referer=apshome>.
"Isotopes of Rutherfordium." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 15 Mar. 2014. Web.
Staszczak, A., J. Dobaczewski, and W. Nazarewicz. "Self-Consistent Study of Fission Barriers of
Even-Even Superheavy Nuclei." phys.utk.edu. PDF. N.p.: n.p., 2008.
Somerville, Lawrence P. "Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Observation of New

Spontaneous Fission Activities From Elements 100 To 105 [eScholarship]. N.p., 07 July 2010. Web.
Post #18-My Personal History

Over the last month and a half, I have been working on my personal history. The way I formatted my personal history was by placing it on a Calc (a free LibreOffice version of Excel) spreadsheet and assigning different pages of the spreadsheet different years of my life. Each page consists of list of chronologically-ordered dates. For example, my 2000-2002 page on the spreadsheet starts in Spring 2000 and ends in Fall of 2002. The very first page is an introduction to aid navigation through my history. This first page also contains two disclaimers. The first one is that my history is subject to revision because I remember other important evenets in my past and record them after the initial compilation, and I will eventually add current events once I arrive in the present. The second disclaimer is that my history contains some pretty strong commentary and rebukes against certain aspects of my past.
We have all heard the adage "The best time to plant a tree was twenty years ago. The second best time to plant a tree is right now". I have used the principle behind this adage by writing my personal history. I look back to my life at Spokane Valley, Washington, when I was seven to ten years old, with much fondness due to the quaint old bungalow my family lived in and the adventurous half-acre yard that we had. I wish I had kept a journal when I was eight years old of those great events at that house, but I can still record that past in my history today, because if I try to do so in the future I will forget that past even more.
Writing this personal history of mine has been a very awarding task to me. In one way it is rewarding is that as I write through certain times of my life, I feel a vestige of the aura of that time. For example, as I was writing about the end of my senior year and the high school graduation, I felt semi-forgotten feelings of hopelessness (with my computer drawings for architecture), triumph (when I karaoke-sang the Linkin Park song "In the End" at my senior all-night party), and relief (when I get an A in my architecture class after the ordeal with the drawings).
Another way that me writing my personal history has been rewarding is that the trends of the time period I write in bring back semi-forgotten memories of other landmark events in my life at the time. In other words, me writing down my past helps me to remember more of it. The result is a fairly thorough summary of my past.
Post #17-My Blog Background

You may ask: Why did Nate Kloepfer choose to have a blocky background for his blog? I chose a blocky background for two reasons: to remind me of my nuclide charts which consist of integer numbers of protons and neutrons plotted against each other to display the known nuclides and their decay properties, and to remind me of one of my favorite video games, MInecraft, which consists of a world of specific "blocks".
There can only be integer amounts of protons and neutrons in a nucleus. A proton cannot be divided into thousands of smaller versions of itself: it is composed of only three elementary subatomic particles which are two up quarks and one down quark bound by virtual pions carrying the strong nuclear force. Neutrons also cannot be divided into smaller versions of themselves because they are also composed of three elementary subatomic particles: two down quarks and one up quark, with virtual pions and gluons holding them all together constituting the nuclear strong force. Protons and neutrons are part of a larger family of subatomic particles called "baryons" (bary- means "heavy") that consists of many heavier, very unstable baryons. The most stable baryon after the proton and neutron is the lambda baryon, which is the third least massive of all the baryons. It is composed of one up quark, one down quark, and one strange quark. The strange quark is unstable because its decay to an less massive up quark is exothermic, and the lambda baryon therefore decays by emitting a negative weak boson that splits into an anti-up quark and a down quark with a lifetime of a seventh of a nanosecond. The most massive possible baryon is the triple bottom omega baryon, with three bottom quarks, but it has not been observed in any experiments. I predict its mass to be around 15x the mass of a proton, or about the mass of a nitrogen atom. Its predicted lifetime is relatively long compared to other baryons, about 500 femtoseconds, because its bottom quarks can only decay via a negative weak boson to charm quarks or less frequently, up quarks. Top quarks do not form hadrons (this includes baryons) because the Standard Model of Particle Physics predicts its lifetime to be 5E-25 seconds, or about a trillion times shorter than the triple bottom omega's predicted lifetime. This lifetime of 5E-25 seconds is too short for the top quark to interact via the strong force to form any hadron (composite particle composed of quarks). The top quark's very short lifetime is due to its high mass (approximately the mass of a rhenium atom or about 186x heavier than a proton) and the presence of its third-generation cousin, the bottom quark, makes it so that its weak decay is very easy, for intra-generational decays are more rapid than inter-generational decays between quarks.

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Post #16-Parallels Between Nuclei Size and Living Life

There are two types of nuclei in the world: those that are light enough to liberate energy when fused, and those that are heavy enough to liberate energy when they fission. A dramatic example heavy nuclei disintegrating is the decay chain of the heaviest isotope: ununoctium-294. Once this atom is implanted in californium-249 by fusion with calcium-48, it ejects 2-3 alpha particles and 2 fission fragments within a second. The less massive heavier elements like uranium disintegrate at much slower rates. For uranium-238, it takes almost 4.5 billion years for half of a given sample to decay by alpha emission. The lightest nuclei, hydrogen and helium, are always the first to be "burned", or fused in the core of the star because they liberate more energy. The fusion of successively heavier nuclei (carbon, oxygen, neon, silicon, etc) liberates less energy per fusion until the maxima is reached, which is iron-56.
There are also two types of people in this world: those that have overscheduled themselves to the point of death, and those that have underscheduled themselves to a point where they are missing out on major opportunities. There exists an optimal point of scheduling: prioritizing. With prioiritizing, one can take advantage of major opportunities without becoming burned out. With prioritizing, one is able to cut out the waste and excess in their lives to conserve resources. Much like all nuclei will eventually decay to iron-56, releasing all possible energy, everyone should prioritize all of their opportunities in life to release the most potential.
Post #15-My Google Profile Picture

My profile picture may seem odd to others. Other profile pictures I've observed have been actual pictures of their respective owners, cartoon characters, or default dark blue guy against a light blue background. My profile picture is the flame from a burning pop bottle cap full of hand sanitizer.
Why would I ignite a bottle cap full of hand sanitizer? My original intention was to catalyze the oxidation of hand sanitizer to aldehydes via my newly acquired platinum wire I got for my element collection. It was a warm August day in 2013, and I was reading about an experiment in John Emsley's book Nature's Building Blocks that entailed holding a platinum wire in methanol and watching the wire glow red as the methanol was oxidized to formaldehyde. I wanted to see a glowing hot wire, and so with nothing else better to do I filled a pop bottle cap full of hand sanitizer and brought it outside and stuck the platinum wire inside.
Expecting gas bubbles, heat, and steam to emanate off of the hand sanitizer, I was very disappointed to find that nothing happened when I stuck the platinum wire inside. I felt a little let down when Eureka! I realized that hand sanitizer was composed of ethyl alcohol, which is flammable. I realized that I could redeem my failed experiment by igniting the hand sanitizer and watching it burn.
I borrowed a stove lighter from my garage, brought the bottle cap full of hand sanitizer outside, and ignited it. The flame burned cold and almost invisible at first. I wanted to get a good picture of it, so I carried this little lamp into the garage and closed the door and took the picture that is now my profile picture. After a few minutes of burning, I realized that the hot alcohol flame was melting the cap plastic and that the burning hand sanitizer would escape the confines of the cap. I ran into the kitchen, got a glass of water, and doused the hot flame. The water sizzled as the flame was quenched. The plastic bottle cap, once a rigid, moderately hard translucent cap, was now an opaque rubbery useless blob.
I asked my parents if I could repeat the experiment, but they said no. Later that afternoon as they were leaving for some activity, I asked again if I could do the experiment. They said, "Definitely not."
I have always been intrigued by fire. When I was nine years old my family went out and had a campfire in our filled-in swimming pool. When I was twelve, I went with my deacon's quorum to camp out by Utah Lake by a small tumble-down playhouse called "The Wikieup". After we built the campfire over an ant hill, my scout leader threw an old lighter into the campfire. We waited with awe until fwoosh!, the lighter released a small mushroom cloud of fire. With the backdrop of a previously torched car, we scavenged around for wood, couch cushions, and christmas lights to add to the fire. The christmas lights had a hard time burning. The next morning, after this same scout leader was done cooking pancakes, he set the plastic bull with pancake batter at the bottom on top of the fire. We watched as the pancake cooked in the bottom of melting plastic bowl. We finally got to put a couch cushion on the fire, and we watched it slowly melt away. After a campout that summer, I gained a reputation in the Vineyard First Ward of a "pyro".